The Delusion That Russia Can Be Separated From Either China Or Iran
Seemingly a central delusion of current US foreign policy
It is now being reported that Trump is “very angry” with Putin over the ceasefire negotiations, one’s where he has offered Russia next to nothing. The Russian leadership very much understands the untrustworthiness of the US and sees a ceasefire as the end result of the extensive negotiations and agreements required to meet Russia’s security needs. Trump is trying to put the cart before the horse, seeming to believe that he is such as superb negotiator that he can get the Russians to act against their own interests. Utterly delusional.
The Trump administration seems to sincerely believe that it can make a deal on Ukraine that will not meet Russia’s repeatedly stated security needs, and that such a settlement will facilitate Russia’s acquiescence to a Western military attack on Iran and/or somewhat of a distancing of Russia from China. Even writing the above words makes plain the utter delusional state of anyone that believes such nonsense. But it does seem that the US administration is so deluded, a condition pointed to by the US extreme haste and lack of diplomatic professionalism and competence in its negotiations with Russia over Ukraine.
Instead of simply dumping Ukraine and pointing to the Ukraine War as a “Biden problem” that the US needs to extricate itself from, the administration is digging itself deeper and deeper into the conflict in a vain attempt to reach an agreement with Russia that will heavily neutralize it as part of the Russia-Iran-China pole of resistance against the US Empire. Then the administration can get on with its decades-old wish to crush independent Iran, itself a delusional fever dream, to gain both Middle East supremacy and fulfil the desires of the supremacist Zionists.
That Iran is a vast and extremely mountainous nation with its capital far in the mountainous north (vs. the much smaller Iraq with its major cities sitting in the southern plain) with a population of 91 million (vs. Iraq’s 17 million) and extensive indigenous military industrial capabilities (vs. an Iraq destroyed by two decades of war and sanctions) seems to not penetrate the thick skulls of the US administration. Also that unlike in the two wars against Iraq, neighbouring countries such as Saudi Arabia will in no way provide bases from which to attack Iran and that unlike Iraq with its primitive Scuds, Iran has an extensive array of leading edge missiles. None of this seems to matter, even the ability of Iran to utterly destroy the oil and gas output of the region (creating a global economic depression) together with US bases and much of Israel. Neither the predictable colossal shock of the world at such naked US/Western aggression, and the utter destruction of what remains of US soft power and legitimacy; especially among the Muslim nations of Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan and the Stans.
Would Russia and China sit idly by while the US starts to pick of their resistance one nation at a time? Of course not. China with its massive strategic oil reserves, its ability to accelerate even more its move away from imported-oil driven transport, and its close relationship with Russia and the Stans, will weather the storm better than most. Of course, Russia will benefit massively from the huge run up in oil prices. Both will take actions to support Iran and to punish the US, with Russia working to replenish Iran’s military inventories and basic supplies while China is in a position to cripple the US (including its MIC) through the limitation of critical exports. Central Asia and ASEAN, and possibly even India, would also come closer to Russia and China as they distance themselves more from the US.
A US large-scale attack upon Iran may very well turn out to be the equivalent of the Athenian attack upon Sicily, one that sapped its strength and hastened its fall. For Israel it may very well be the equivalent of a “bridge too far” as utter chaos and destruction is wreaked within and its Big Brother protector is shown to be much weaker than advertised.
Russia may actually end up saving the US administration from its own delusions by refusing to accept the terms on offer with respect to the war in Ukraine and continue fighting until Ukraine collapses. A collapse which would free up much of the now battle-hardened Russian military to support Iran.
The alliance between Russia and China is not one that can be undermined by a US and West that has repeatedly displayed its dogged determination to subjugate both rather than deal with them in good faith and on equal terms. Any parallels drawn between Nixon’s 1972 opening to China and the current period are utterly destroyed by the vast differences between that period and the present. All the while, China is removing its dependencies upon Western technological goods and in many areas leaving the West in its technological advancing dust. Without such dependencies, together its its massive strategic oil reserves, access to the vast oil and gas resources of Russia and Central Asia and its ever increasing electric transport footprint, China will be able to easily withstand whatever sanctions and export controls are thrown at it. Even an energy embargo, or attempt to crush China’s economy through exceptionally high oil prices will only boomerang back on the West while greatly strengthening Russia. The shoe is rather on the other foot with China’s ability to cripple the West through selective export restrictions while residing within the EurAsian continent surrounded by allies and neutrals.
Any outright triggering of a war by the US over Taiwan could also easily become another Sicilian Expedition for the US, as its economy (and MIC) become crippled without critical imports, sanctions and attempts at a blockade fail, and the vaunted US navy and armed services suffer a humiliating defeat. The only real risk to China would be that the US administration would react with a nuclear murder suicide.
Your analogy between a possible US attack on Iran and the Athenian Sicilian Expedition is very apt. Such an attack would result in an imperial disaster the likes of which Americans have never experienced.
The Straits of Hormuz WOULD be closed. Fuel prices WOULD shoot up. At least one US aircraft carrier and several other ships WOULD be sunk.
Notice I say "would" and not "will," precisely because the Pentagon knows these things. The reluctance of military professionals to attack Iran is the best hope for peace right now. Ironic, I know, but there it is.
We live in interesting times.
Re China, I don't think Trump admin has a chance and I think they know it.
Re Iran, I don't think Trump admin has a choice. They got their sponsorship from the Israel lobby to fight Iran, otherwise Biden/Harris were already giving everything else there is to give. And so they do need to contrive some way to keep Moscow from making it too painful - after the US just spent 3 years feeding all kinds of terrorist attacks against Russia.
For some reason still unclear to me, the Trump team (or perhaps the Israeli side) are also in a great hurry to get it all going. One would think they have 2 years before Republicans lose Congressional majorities in the mid-terms. Alistair Crooke presented this theory about legal mechanisms in the defunct JCPOA snapback sanctions provisions which expire next year - (ie to be used as a legal justification for an escalation process that would lead to war, while being able to claim the other side started it), but that's something Blinken/Biden would do. Trump team do these theatrical Austin Powers / Dr. Evil moves like having the Canadians kidnap Meng Wanzhou in order to defeat Huawei. They're not going to care about the timing of a treaty they already scuttled.
I actually think they're simply trying random stuff - with reckless abandon - and seeing what sticks. The one thing they have going for them, is that Russia and China might actually be quite content to have the US commit to an actual war, before doing anything. Which would be very unfortunate, because I think they can prevent it too with a firm show of support.