Discussion about this post

User's avatar
bevin's avatar

The important thing here is not the candidate- although the 'image' of a muslim, pro Palestinian with Social Democratic policy proposals is relevant- but the way in which the victory was won.

The mobilisation of canvassers and the building of a large network of small donors to finance the campaign is what enthused Hudson and Woolf.

The DNC model of politics is built on the basis of large donors, PACs with unlimited resources and keeping on the right side of the capitalist media and culture.

The trick for AOC and any other sell outs involves dumping the people and the organisation which elected them in such a way as to ensure it does not elect their successors.

It is mistaken to believe that campaigns such as Zohran's are routine, they are not.

As to where they will lead, that will depend upon whether they become democratic organisations built not upon candidates but principled policies. As to which all that we know is that it is possible if we, and people like us, having learned from history, commit ourselves to activity - the bases of the status quo are very unstable, the ruling class is weakening, morally, intellectually and materially and this is quite evident. We live on the eve of one of humanity's great crises: a 1789 or a 1917 is coming, because it must.

Roger brings us the pessimism ofa sharp intellect, what we need is the optimism of the militant's will. We make history. Here we are. It is immanent.

Expand full comment
John Kirsch's avatar

The possibly future NYC mayor and his wife look like socialites, not socialists.

They'd fit right in at the Met gala.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts